Various properties of compartalized structures

Matthieu Piquerez

Complete case

We follow these conventions, with d=nd=n and ΣΣ non-rational non-simplicial a priori. We use the standard inner product. By locally we mean for each compartment.

Conventions and notations

Let P,QP, Q be ΣΣ-compartmentalized polytopes, K,LK,L ΣΣ-compartmentalized convex bodies. CC is a full dimensional strictly convex cone.

Summarizing basic properties

To see the proofs, overlay the link, read, and then click the link.

We systematically study the links between :

and the following properties

In the following cases, ΣΣ being complete :

In particular via the followings operations :

Study of the fans properties :

(+) ⇐ (<) ⇒ (△)
(+) ⇏ (△)
(+) is stable by : subfaces star tropical modification
(<) is stable by : subfaces star tropical modification
(△) is stable by : subfaces star tropical modification

Case (*)

Case (+)

Lemmas

Lemma “Characterization of acute-angled cones via orthogonal projections” 1

For CC a cone, the followings are equivalent.

  1. the orthogonal projection of CC on NηN_η where ηη is a facet of CC is included in CC,
  2. the angle between two facets is at most 90∘90^∘,
Proof
Lemma “Faces of acute-angled cones are acute-angled” 2
(<) stable by subfaces
Proof (🔴)
It suffices to check it for facets. Assume there is a facet ηη diamond τ≺σ,σ′≺ητ ≺ σ,σ' ≺ η with nη/σ⋅nη/σ′>0n_{η/σ}⋅n_{η/σ'} > 0. The lattice above ττ is the one of a polygon. Take two consecutive facets ζ,ξζ,ξ apart from ηη containing ττ. Let ππ be the orthogonal onto ηη. Let us prove that nC/ζ⋅nC/ξ>0n_{C/ζ}⋅n_{C/ξ} > 0. We have nC/ζ=π(nC/ζ)+⟨nC/η,nC/ζ⟩nC/η n_{C/ζ} = π(n_{C/ζ}) + ⟨n_{C/η},n_{C/ζ}⟩n_{C/η} hence nC/ζ⋅nC/ξ=π(nC/ζ)⋅π(nC/ξ)+⟨nC/η,nC/ζ⟩×⟨nC/η,nC/ξ⟩. n_{C/ζ}⋅n_{C/ξ} = π(n_{C/ζ})⋅π(n_{C/ξ}) + ⟨n_{C/η},n_{C/ζ}⟩ × ⟨n_{C/η},n_{C/ξ}⟩. We just have to prove that the three inner products are nonnegative, and not all zeroes. For the two last ones, the non-negativity comes from point 2, and they cannot be both zero, since otherwise ξ∩ζξ ∩ ζ would be a codimension 1 cone containing ττ and parallel to ηη, that is would be included in ℝηℝη which is clearly impossible. For the first scalar product, ⟨nC/ζ,⋅⟩⟨n_{C/ζ},⋅⟩ is nonnegative on CC, hence on ηη. So π(nC/ζ)∈ηη∨=ℝ≥0nη/σ+ℝ≥0nη/σ′π(n_{C/ζ}) ∈ η_η^∨ = ℝ_{≥0}n_{η/σ} + ℝ_{≥0}n_{η/σ'} (the dual of ηη in its own tangent space). Hence, π(nC/ζ)⋅π(nC/ξ)≥0π(n_{C/ζ})⋅π(n_{C/ξ}) ≥ 0.
Lemma “Acute-angled cones are simplicial” 3
(<) ⇒ (△)
Proof
By induction, all the facets are simplicial cones. Moreover, by induction, all proper star fans are simplicial. Hence, the link of 00 in CC is a simple and simplicial polytope. Hence it is a simplex, or of dimension 2. It remains to deal with the case dim(C)=3\dim(C) = 3. This follows from the fact that the sum of the angles of a ss-gon on 𝕊2𝕊^2 is greater than 180∘⋅(s−2)180^∘⋅(s-2). Hence, if all the angles are at most 90∘90^∘, then s=3s=3.
Lemma “Acute-angled cones are positive” 4
(<) ⇒ (+)
Proof
Take eρe_ρ and eρ′e_{ρ'} in two rays ρ,ρ′ρ, ρ' in the same cone. By Lemma “Acute-angled cones are simplicial” 3, both rays belong to the same 2-cone, which is acute-angled by @lem:acute-subface. Hence eρ⋅eρ′≥0e_ρ⋅e_{ρ'} ≥ 0.
Lemma “Compartmentalized structures are co-compartmentalized” 5
  1. ⇒ (c*)
Proof

Let C∈ΣC ∈ Σ and consider P∩CP ∩ C. Let ηη be a facet of P∩CP ∩ C which is not in a facet of CC.

If nP/η∉Cn_{P/η} ∉ C, then there exists ρ∈C∨ρ ∈ C^∨ such that ⟨eρ,nP/η⟩<0⟨e_ρ, n_{P/η}⟩ < 0. Hence x−εeρx - ε e_ρ, for some xx in the interior of ηηη_η, does not belong to PP, so PP is not compartmentalized.

Hence, the outer normal vectors to the facets of P∩CP ∩ C are either in CC, or in a ray of C∨C^∨. Now, P∩C={x∣⟨eρ,x⟩≥0,∀ρ∈C1 and ⟨u,x⟩≤maxP⟨u,⋅⟩,∀u∈C}={x∈C∣⟨u,x⟩≤maxP⟨u,⋅⟩,∀u∈C}. P ∩ C = \{x \mid ⟨e_ρ, x⟩ ≥ 0, ∀ ρ ∈ C_1 \text{ and } ⟨u,x⟩ ≤ \max_P ⟨u,⋅⟩, ∀ u ∈ C \} = \{x ∈ C ∣ ⟨u,x⟩ ≤ \max_P ⟨u,⋅⟩, ∀ u ∈ C \}. So P∩CP ∩ C verifies the condition of (c*)(c*).

(Counter-)examples

Example “A compartmentalized structure not containing zero” 1

Example “A positive fan which is not acute-angled” 2
Take the fan of orthants in ℝ3ℝ^3. Blow-up the positive orthant in the barycenter. span of (1,0,0)(1,0,0), (0,1,0)(0,1,0), (10,10,1)(10,10,1).
Example “A compartmentalized structure which is not max-compartmentalized” 3
Take the fan in Example “A positive fan which is not acute-angled” 2 with the polytope [0;1]×{0}×{0}[0;1]×\{0\}×\{0\}.
Example “Two compartmentalized structures whose Minkowski sum and convex hulls are not compartmentalized” 4
Take the polytope in Example “A compartmentalized structure which is not max-compartmentalized” 3 and another one which is {0}×[0;1]×{0}\{0\}×[0;1]×\{0\}. Then both their sums and their convex hull are not compartmentalized.

Archive

Basic properties (of complete compartmentalized structures obsolete)

Example 5
Wrong: 0∈K0 ∈ K.
Proof

Lemma 6 (A cone always intersects its dual)
Let CC be a cone. Then C∩C∨C ∩ C^∨ is a full-dimensional cone.
Proof
Let ee a unit vector in CC maximizing the minimum of ⟨e,C∩𝕊n−1⟩⟨e, C ∩ 𝕊^{n-1}⟩. Then ee is in the interior, otherwise we can add an normal inner vector and we get something better. C′=C∩e⟂C' = C ∩ e^⟂ is strictly convex. If it is 00, then we are done. Otherwise, take vv in the interior of C′∨C'^∨. Then (e+εv)/‖e+εv‖(e+εv)/‖e+εv‖ is strictly better than ee. Indeed, the maxima are all obtained in the same open half-space of v⟂v^⟂ (they are in (e⟂)≤0(e^⟂)_{≤0} and then look at the segment between them and ee).
Lemma 7

Let CC be a cone. Then the following are equivalent

  1. the orthogonal projection of CC on NηN_η where ηη is a facet of CC is included in CC,
  2. the angle between two facets is at most 90∘90^∘,
  3. any face verifies 1.,
  4. any star fan verifies 2.,
  5. star fan around rays verifies 2.,

and they strictly imply

  1. for any x,y∈Cx,y ∈ C, ⟨x,y⟩≥0⟨x,y⟩ ≥ 0,
  2. CC is simplicial.
Proof

Here is an alternative proof for the dimension 3 case. Take the dual cone C∨C^∨. Take a vector ee in the interior of C∨C^∨ such that C∨∩e⟂=0_C^∨ ∩ e^⟂ = {\underline{0}}. Such a vector exists by Lemma 6 (A cone always intersects its dual). Point 2. is equivalent to requiring eρ⋅eρ′≤0e_ρ⋅e_{ρ'} ≤ 0 whenever ρ∧ρ′≠𝟏ρ ∧ ρ' ≠ 𝟏. Project orthogonally the eρe_ρ on HH. Let us call the projection map ππ. Then π(eρ)⋅π(eρ′)<eρ⋅eρ′≤0π(e_ρ)⋅π(e_{ρ'}) < e_ρ⋅e_{ρ'} ≤ 0 (⋆) since both vectors lies in the open half-space H>0H_{>0}. If π(C∨)≠Hπ(C^∨) ≠ H, then clearly (⋆) cannot holds. Hence, the projection of C∨C^∨ induces a complete fan of dimension two with only strictly obtuse angles. This can only have three facets.

There seems to be no much acute-angled fans. In article, Theorem C state that no complete fan strictly acute-angled of dimension 5 of higher exists. Maybe a reference?

We say that a cone CC is acute-angled if any of the previous statement holds. We say that a fan is acute-angled if its cones are.

A cone is positive if C⊆C∘C ⊆ C^∘.

Example 6 (Positive cone not in orthant)
Take the cone CC spanned by the permutations of (7,4,−1)(7,4,-1). Then ⟨x,y⟩>0⟨x,y⟩ > 0 for any x,y∈σx,y ∈ σ but CC cannot be mapped orthogonally inside the positive orthant. Indeed, take an orthant cone C⊆O⊆C∨C ⊆ O ⊆ C^∨. Then three orthogonal vectors e,f,ge, f, g in C∨C^∨. Then ❓

❓same question when simplicial

Example 7 (A compartmentalized structure locally but not globally convex)
Wrong: Any body TT ΣΣ-compartmentalized whose compartments are convex is convex.
Proof
Take T=[0;1]×[0;1]+[−1;0]×[−1;0]T = [0;1]×[0;1] + [-1;0]×[-1;0]. It is anti-blocking and locally convex but not globally.
Lemma 8
For each ρρ, argmaxPeρ*(x)∈ρ\mathrm{argmax}_P e^*_ρ(x) ∈ ρ.
Proof
Otherwise, let xx be the argmax on ρρ and yy be the global argmax. Then, εy+(1−ε)xεy+(1-ε)x belongs to a cone σ≻ρσ ≻ ρ for ε>0ε > 0 small enough.
Question 1
Are compartmentalized polytopes stable by Minkowski sum?
Answer

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4